Marriage in the 21st Century: Why It
Must Not Change
Ft. Hamilton
Station, NY – Michael R. Long, Conservative Party State Chairman,
reminded the 212 Members of the State Legislature, today, that marriage
has served society well throughout history and should not be tampered with
in the guise of a civil rights issue. “In today’s society, we really know
far too much about the sexual preferences of our citizens...what should be
a profound loving experience has become a flaunting of sexuality exposed
to society...with those who are happy to exploit their sexuality demanding
the respect that marriage brings,” said Long. Long reminded the Members of
the Legislature that civil unions and gay marriage is not a civil rights
issue, rather it is a demand to normalize homosexuality in society in the
following memo:
Americans and New Yorkers especially are supportive of equality and doing
what is perceived to be right. We abhor bullies and would like to believe
that we lead the way in progressive thought yet we are embroiled in a
debate on marriage and the possibility of changing the meaning of
marriage, despite the fact that the definition is well settled under the
principle of stare decisis.
Gay marriage, or the new progressive term, same sex marriage (because the
general public is opposed to gay marriage) and civil unions are not a
civil rights issue as the gay community would have people believe. It is
an assault on traditional marriage and is the final battle to have people
accept the normalization of homosexuality. Homosexuality is culturally
accepted...our need to make certain that everyone is treated equally has
accepted...no it has welcomed the homosexual lifestyle into our lives via
the mass media and guilt that heterosexuals should not deny homosexuals
the joy of committed relationships and the greatest joy of all...having
and raising our children.
Our Constitution states that all men are created equal and from that
statement, we strive to make all things equal. However, as reasonable
thinking people, we know that we are not all created equal. Not everyone
plays baseball like the Babe did, nor is every basketball player the same
as Earl Monroe. We can’t all drive a car like Dale Earnhardt and trust me,
we do not all look like Mel Gibson, even on a bad day, nor when we sing do
we sound like Barbra Streisand.
Our Constitution only guarantees that we are given the same opportunities
to achieve equality. We know that, in order to achieve equality, we must
embrace our differences, yet we also understand that our differences often
compliment our shortcomings and help us become equal partners to each
other. Our strength is entwined in our differences. A traditional
marriage, one man and one woman, brings two perspectives that compliment
each other to the family, which has served society well for thousands of
years.
As a society, we have become immune to the assault on marriage and now we
are told that gay marriage will benefit us by bringing a financial
windfall to New York. The NYC comptroller speaks of destination weddings
and the tourist dollars that will pour into the coffers of New York. Did
he mention the untold cost to health care? Small business? Pension
systems? The cost to taxpayers as government shoulders more and more
family cost due to the dissolution of families as demonstrated in the
Scandinavian countries that enacted gay marriage laws.
The Gay community is trying to make this debate a debate on civil rights
and so far, it is succeeding. It is not, nor has it ever been. The Civil
Rights movement began when Rosa Parks refused to relinquish her seat to a
white man. A gay person has never been made to sit in the back of the bus.
Service to gay partners in restaurants has never been denied. And today we
elect openly gay members to the Legislature. We condemn the violence that
occurs and we deplore the intolerance against the gay community.
We will, however, continue to stand strong against gay marriage and civil
unions between same sex couples and continue to define marriage as a union
between one man and one woman. The traditional family is the cornerstone
of social order and must not be replaced with an amorphous category of
sexual liaisons.
- 30 -